In recent times movie studios have found a new way to make sure their tent pole blockbusters – especially those with huge fan bases – make even more money than they are supposed to with a seemingly simple strategy. Start hyping the movie 2-3 years in advance and keep doing it consistently till the movie comes out. It’s a strategy reserved mostly for comic book movies which have the strongest fan bases. Batman v Superman is the latest film to make full use of this strategy and is supposed to serve as the launching pad for Warner Brothers and DC Comics’s own cinematic universe.
Set shortly after the events of 2013’s Man of Steel, Batman v Superman finds most people having indifferent feelings about the Man of Steel after the destruction caused by his battle with General Zod in the last movie. One of these people happens to be Bruce Wayne, who plays an older, far more jaded Batman. Someone who has apparently been fighting crime in Gotham for over twenty years. He fears that Superman is capable of destroying the planet if his powers go unchecked which puts which puts him on a direct collision course with the Man of Steel.
There’s not a lot going on when it comes to character motivations in what is supposed to be the biggest onscreen showdown between perhaps two of the most prominent characters in American pop-culture. There isn’t a lot going on when it comes to structuring a proper story either, but despite it’s many, many flaws, Batman v Superman is a largely enjoyable piece of escapist, popcorn entertainment that I had more than a decent time watching, even though it stretched the boundaries of stupidity on numerous occasions.
Like Man of Steel, Batman v Superman is directed by Zack Snyder, a director who always puts style over substance and Batman v Superman is no different. Visually, it’s very appealing and there are more than a few gorgeous shots in there, but unfortunately the script from David S. Goyer and Chris Terrio lacks structure which reflects on the film significantly. For one thing, it’s bloated. It feels like they tried to cram both Superman sequel and a Batman movie into one movie and as a result you have a bunch of necessary subplots that go absolutely nowhere. You have characters whose motivations and actions are both illogical and questionable while the editing is truly horrible with scenes having no real fluency which really fucks up the film’s structure as well.
But despite everything that’s wrong with this film it has a lot of positives which is why I could never really dislike this film. The biggest of which is undoubtedly Ben Affleck’s portrayal of both Bruce Wayne as the Dark Knight. Affleck does more than a great job at silencing his critics as an older, hardened and far more brutal version of the Caped Crusader. It’s a fantastic performance and a portrayal that easily ranks among the best portrayals of the Dark Knight. I think Jeremy Irons is really great as Alfred even though he has a very limited time on-screen. Henry Cavill as Superman on the other hand is more of a mixed bag mainly because he isn’t given a lot to do but Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor is not only miscast but gives a terribly cringe-worthy and over the top performance that just does not work at all. While Gal Gadot also does well as Wonder Woman in the few scenes she’s in.
I guess the reason a lot of the film succeeds is because it does have that feel of a spectacle that it is supposed to have. The action sequences have some genuine heft and I found the film’s dark and gritty tone to be quite interesting as well.
Altogether, Batman v Superman is a disappointing but fairly middling film that mostly succeeds as an entertaining popcorn blockbuster. Its flaws are many but are often overshadowed by some truly fantastic sequences, which in turn makes the movie pretty passable as well. If you’re looking for a movie that feels like it literally leapt off the comic book pages, you may not have a particularly bad time with this.
5.6/10
-Khalid
yep certain scenes did not flow in from the previous scene but the fighting was epic I just love superman and batman so the movie was great but there was room for improvement .. 🙂
LikeLike
The editing has got to be my biggest problem with this film, it really lacked in proper structure
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really didn’t enjoy this movie. It’s clearly a set up for bigger things but as a standalone, it just doesn’t work. I thought Ben Affleck was great and Gal Gadot impressed me but these two performances aren’t enough to save it. I actually liked Jesse Eisenberg, I think they were going for an unstable, erratic, volatile genius and he nailed it. It’s not the traditional Lex Luthor but I thought it was well done.
LikeLike
Understandable. I thought the movie was pretty inconsistent too and while I didnt particularly like it, it did have certain moments that I really enjoyed.
LikeLike
It’s not a perfect movie. However, it still does some interesting things that have me at least intrigued with where the DC franchise wants to go. Nice review.
LikeLike
Thanks Dan. Agreed, definitely laid the groundwork for that even if alot of it felt forced. But yeah, definitely had some interesting ideas, hope they are explored better in the future
LikeLike
I agree Affleck was really good in the role and Eisenberg was just so miscast and his performance was all over the place. If he tried maybe he would do something good or at least interesting here but he was just annoying
LikeLike
Yeah, it felt like he was just trying way too hard. The moment I saw him on-screen, I was like: ”No.”
LikeLike
Just way overstuffed. I agree there’s just far too much crammed into this movie. The whole thing, plus that dour tone, just weighed the whole thing down for me. Nice action and some great visuals, though.
LikeLike
I wasnt too bothered by the tone but yeah, definitely too much in there.
LikeLike
Yes! A ridiculously structured film with lots that doesn’t make sense but still has so much to offer. I thought Jesse Eissenberg kind of killed it as Lex luthor. He started out way too over-the-top for me but his performance grew into something surprisingly specific instead of just eccentricity for its own sake.
LikeLike
Interesting take. For me, it just didnt click. I didnt hate his performance but it did hit me as a little distracting and took me out of the film quite often
LikeLike
What did you think about the final act?
LikeLike
Wasnt a big fan. Felt pretty rushed, especially the entire Doomsday entrance and fight. There came a point when I actually got kinda tired of all the smashing and bashing and I was looking at my clock, waiting for it to be over
LikeLike
Haha same. Don’t even get me started on that ludicrously shot funeral sequence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I enjoyed this film. Yes not perfect especially the pacing but certainly not as bad as the critics suggested. I loved Ben Affleck’s portrayed of The Dark Knight. It was easily the best thing about this film but also one of the best depictions of Batman period. He was a total badass! I’m interested in seeing the director’s cut to see if the pacing improves because removing a few scenes is one thing, but to remove 30 mins of the film was damaging.
LikeLike
Yeah, a little interested in seeing that cut too and whether it will help make sense of a lot of questions this movie left unanswered. And yeah, Ben Affleck was great. Cant wait to see him in his solo Batman film
LikeLiked by 1 person