Review: Spotlight (2015)


One of the biggest downsides of the growing tech revolution has been the surprising amount of negligence people have formed for the printed word and as a result people have in many ways, forgotten about the power that journalism and the media truly possesses. Movies like All the Presidents Men and even Zodiac are quite rare these days because people are just not that interested in seeing those sort of stories on the big screen.

So in a time like this, it’s always nice to see a film like Spotlight that goes back to the basics with its refreshingly simple style of storytelling and is able to highlight the true power of investigative journalism.


In 2001, editor Marty Baron of The Boston Globe assigns a team of journalists to investigate allegations against John Geoghan, an unfrocked priest accused of molesting more than 80 boys. Led by editor Walter Robinson (Michael Keaton), reporters Michael Rezendes (Mark Ruffalo), Matt Carroll and Sacha Pfeiffer (Rachel McAdams) interview victims and try to unseal sensitive documents and the reporters make it their mission to provide proof of a cover-up of sexual abuse within the Roman Catholic Church.

Spotlight is easily one of the most important films to come out this year. It’s written and directed by Tom McCarthy with Josh Singer sharing co-writing duties on the script. McCarthy, who is known for directing small indie films like The Station Agent, Win Win and The Visitor does easily his most accomplished work yet and the result is a fast-paced, informative and riveting film that engrosses throughout.

spotlight 2015

McCarthy’s compelling script and old school direction really gives the film the grounded feel that a story of this nature needs and with a superb ensemble cast led by Michael Keaton, Mark Ruffalo, Rachel McAdams, Liev Schrieber, John Slattery and Billy Crudrup, the film always manages to stay engaging. The highlight however, is arguably Mark Ruffalo in his passionate and absorbing performance as reporter Mike Rezendes, who acts as the heart and soul of the film.

If there’s any area where Spotlight misses the mark it’s that it fails to truly rise to greatness. There’s nothing particularly profound or shocking revealed here, the focus could have been widened and a lot of that could be because of the fact that the film is pretty straightforward in regards to the story and plot and apart from Mark Ruffalo’s Rezendes, none of the characters feel properly fleshed out either.

Altogether, though Spotlight is a riveting and affecting drama that benefits heavily from the confident writing, direction and solid performances across the board. It’s nothing memorable but still a film, that should be seen for the important subject matter.



15 responses to “Review: Spotlight (2015)

  1. Glad you liked it. I definitely had a strong feeling. It has been extremely memorable for me. It’s stuck with me since I first saw it. As you say, a very important picture.


  2. Man, I swear, me and you are long lost brothers. I agree with this statement whole-heartedly: “The highlight however, is arguably Mark Ruffalo in his passionate and absorbing performance as reporter Mike Rezendes, who acts as the heart and soul of the film.” I LOVED Ruffalo’s work here. I also really loved what Liev Schreiber brought to the table. Totally subdued but full of nuance as well. I also agree that this movie falls short of greatness. It almost gets there but doesn’t have that big punch I crave. Great review!


    • Haha thanks Kev! we might be 😀
      And yeah, Ruffalo was great in this. The Oscar nomination feels well-deserved, I really liked Schreiber too, I agree about how subdued his performance was, I also really liked Keaton too, I thought he was almost as good as Ruffalo, also very subdued and understated.


  3. Great analysis. I agree with a lot of your points. This was solid storytelling and confident directing, but played relatively safe without any obvious standout performance moments. This is truly an ensemble. I also loved the focus on investigative journalism.


    • Thanks man. Yeah it was a great ode to investigative journalism and pretty understated which while is, not a bad thing, certainly prevented the movie from being truly great.


  4. Feel very similar to you on this one. It’s not on the amazing levels of films like Zodiac but it’s just very important subject matter and very well acted.


  5. The performances feel really naturalistic and understated which is what drew me to this film. And I thought the story was pretty effective too, my score would probably be around 8.5/10. Its a solid drama


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s