Review: Steve Jobs (2015)

steve jobs review

After the abysmal Jobs starring Ashton Kutcher it was evident that we needed a movie about Steve Jobs that did justice to the legacy of the great tech pioneer. And so comes Steve Jobs, based on the book by Walter Isaacson, written by Aaron Sorkin and directed by Danny Boyle with Michael Fassbender playing Jobs. This is a movie that most certainly does justice to the legacy of the Apple founder.

Set backstage at three iconic product launches, starting with the unveiling of the Macintosh in 1984 and ending in 1998 with the unveiling of the iMac, Steve Jobs aims to break biopic conventions by focusing on the most important moments of Job’s life instead of his whole life, and the result is a film that while may play fast and loose with the facts, is nonetheless an intelligent, entertaining and thoroughly engaging look behind-the-scenes of and inside the life of Steve Jobs.


But while there are many things to like about this film, Aaron Sorkin’s marvelously scripted screenplay is undoubtedly the main attraction. The snappy, spit-fire dialogue, combined with superb character development makes the film move like a bullet and never and I mean never, was I slightest bit bored. Sorkin did an amazing job with The Social Network which got him an Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay, don’t be surprised if he wins again.

Now Danny Boyle is an incredibly versatile director which is both a good and a bad thing because while he is a great filmmaker you don’t always know if you’re watching a Danny Boyle film and in Steve Job’s case, the film feels like more a Sorkin film that a Boyle one, but that isn’t to say Boyle doesn’t do a great job at the helm. He does. His choice to film the three different acts of the movie in 16mm, 35mm and digital are one of the great filmmaking choices he made on the film and as a result, all three acts have a uniquely distinct feel.

steve-jobs jeff daniels michael fassbender

And at the film’s center is Michael Fassbender, who gives what is unquestionably the best performance of his career thus far, one of the best of the year. Even though, Fassbender looks nothing like Jobs, he’s able to pull off a convincing and commanding turn as the Apple founder in a performance that is both masterfully composed and layered. And complimenting him are a trio of great supporting performances from Jeff Daniels, Seth Rogen and Kate Wintslet as John Scully, Steve Wozniak and Joanna Newson respectively. All of whom bring great depth to their real life subjects.

Steve Jobs is the rare biopic that isn’t tedious to watch and much more than just a history lesson. It offers a fascinating and compelling look at one of the most influential and important personalities of our times thanks to Aaron Sorkin’s brilliant screenplay and a deeply humanizing portrayal of Jobs by Michael Fassbender.




22 responses to “Review: Steve Jobs (2015)

  1. Such a great movie, wouldn’t be surprised if Aaron Sorkin was nominated and won. His only other competitor would be Adam McKay who wrote “The Big Short”. Fassbender was brilliant as well and visually stunning setting really helped create a fantastic atmosphere. Great review Khalid 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I don’t know, man. This did get “tedious” for me at times. The first act is brilliant. The second act…almost as brilliant. The third…less so, by far. And I feel like Sorkin’s pacing and dialogue is spot-on brilliant, like you. But I also feel like that tight structure really boxed Boyle (or any director) in way too much. I was begging for a bit more time with those flashbacks. Just a bit. Great review! You liked this a bit more than I did, but so did most, I’d say.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks man. Respect your views of course but personally, the film had me engrossed and entertained throughout. The flashbacks didn’t matter because the story onscreen was so compelling.


  3. Great review, Khalid. I really enjoyed this movie too. It has so much energy it feels like an action flick, and like you said Sorkins dialogue is the bullets. I loved the structure as well, framed around Jobs’ daughter. A great character arc for sure. Thanks for the commentary, buddy.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Well, not exacty. I thought, Steve Jobs was very different because of the unconventional structure and at times, felt almost like a play. The story and characters were a lot different too and this was far more fast-paced and energetic than The Social Network, although I think The Social Network is a far better film


  4. Pingback: Top 10 Movies of 2015 | The Blazing Reel·

  5. Great reviews and comments here. Glad I found you. I agree this is a technically brilliant film, but what surprised me what how unflattering is the portrait of Jobs. It is certainly is here to bury Caesar, not praise him. If you would like to compare thoughts please read my review at I will be following your work.


  6. Pingback: The 2016 ‘I See FlyPaper’ Movie Awards: And the Winners Are… | I See Movies·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s